NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB

The value card of this series. 16 GB of GDDR7 at mainstream money — double the VRAM of the 4060 Ti 16G for similar cost, on a 128-bit bus at 448 GB/s.

16 GB GDDR7 448 GB/s 128-bit bus 180 W TDP

Technical specifications

GPU die
GB206
CUDA cores
4608
Boost clock
~2.57 GHz
VRAM
16 GB GDDR7
Memory bus
128-bit
Memory bandwidth
448 GB/s
PCIe
5.0 x16
NVLink
none
TDP
180 W
Release
May 2025

What these specs mean for llama.cpp

16 GB — the tier that opens up

This is the spec that matters. 16 GB is the line where the lineup reorganizes:

No 30-series card at this price offered 16 GB. The jump from the 8 GB cards isn't 2× options — it's the MoE and 27B tiers at all.

448 GB/s — mid-30-series speed

The 128-bit bus caps token generation at 3070-class speed: ~55–72 t/s on 8B, ~30–42 t/s on 13B Q4. For the models this VRAM unlocks (27B Q3, 30B-A3B MoE), that's plenty for chat — MoE generation in particular runs at ~70–90 t/s because only the active experts stream through the bus.

Compute and power

4608 cores at 180 W — prompt processing around 500–700 t/s on 13B. The card is quiet, cool and cheap to run; the value case is VRAM-per-dollar, not speed.

The value math 16 GB GDDR7 at this price is what the 30-series never offered: the 3060 12G (12 GB, 360 GB/s) and 3080 (10 GB, 760 GB/s) both sit on the wrong side of the 16 GB line. If your budget stops before 5070 Ti territory, this is the card.

Before the numbers: if your model ships a built-in multi-token-prediction head (e.g. Qwen 3.5/3.6/3.8, Gemma 4), generation can be made faster with --spec-type draft-mtp --spec-draft-n-max 2 --parallel 1 — on this card that's worth +40–70% (estimated) on token generation; no per-card community A/B exists for this card yet; the estimate follows the low-bandwidth end of the record, which gains the most at n-max 2. It costs ~0.6–2 GB extra VRAM and does not change output quality, and it only applies to MTP-capable models — Llama-class models are unaffected. Details and the tuning rules: MTP guide →

Expected performance (Q4_K_M, single GPU)

ModelSize on GPUToken genToken gen (MTP est.)Prompt proc.Fits?
8B Q8_0~9.7 GB~55–72 t/s~77–122 t/s~500–650 t/s✅ 32K ctx
13B Q4_K_M~8.5 GB~30–42 t/s~43–71 t/s~550–700 t/s✅ 32K+ ctx
13B Q6_K~13.8 GB~25–33 t/s~36–56 t/s~500–650 t/s✅ 8K ctx
27B Q3_K_M~15.8 GB~13–18 t/s~19–31 t/s~350–450 t/s⚠️ 4–8K ctx
MoE 30B-A3B (Q3)~14.5 GB~70–90 t/s~100–150 t/s~500–700 t/s⚠️ 4–8K ctx, 3B active

MTP est. = rough prior with --spec-type draft-mtp for models that ship MTP heads (Qwen 3.5/3.6/3.8, Gemma 4); Llama-class models get no MTP speedup. Actual gains depend on model, quant, context length, llama.cpp build and your card — sweep --spec-draft-n-max, don't trust the column blindly. MTP guide →

Estimates for full GPU offload (-ngl 99), ~8K context, batch 2048. Token generation scales roughly with memory bandwidth; individual runs vary by model architecture (GQA vs MHA, MoE) and llama.cpp build. MoE token gen depends on active params, not total — treat as a bonus speed tier.

27B models (Qwen class) — Q4 / Q5 / Q6 / Q8

QuantGGUF size1× 5060 Ti (16 GB)2× 5060 Ti (32 GB)
Q3_K_M~15.8 GB⚠️ ~13–18 t/s, 4–8K ctx✅ (overkill)
Q4_K_M~19 GB❌ ~3 GB over✅ ~24–30 t/s, 8–16K ctx
Q5_K_M~22 GB❌✅ ~20–25 t/s, 8K ctx
Q6_K~25 GB❌✅ ~18–22 t/s, 8K ctx
Q8_0~33 GB❌❌ ~1 GB over

Single-card, 27B means Q3 — usable for chat, a real quality step down from Q4. The 2× build (360 W, 32 GB) is the cheapest proper 27B rig on this site: Q4_K_M at ~24–30 t/s with 16K context, Q5 at 8K, and MoE 30B models at Q4 (~18 GB) running at ~95–125 t/s.

Practical tips

Multi-card: 2×, 3×, 4×

No NVLink: tensor split over PCIe 5.0 with a ~20–30% tax. 16 GB per tile means a pair reaches 32 GB — the 27B Q4/Q5 line.

BuildGPU powerVRAM27B Q4_K_M27B Q5_K_MMoE 30B Q4
2× 5060 Ti360 W32 GB~24–30 t/s, 8–16K ctx~20–25 t/s, 8K ctx~95–125 t/s

The 2-card build is the whole point of this card in a multi-GPU context: 32 GB at 360 W, and MoE models at full Q4 quantization. A normal ATX board with two x16 (or x8/x8) slots is enough; no workstation hardware required.

Cheapest 27B-Q4 rig 2× 5060 Ti beats 4× 3050/5060 (more power, slower per card, more slots) and approaches a 2× 3090 on VRAM at far less cost — with the PCIe split tax in exchange for NVLink's comfort.

Offloading (CPU RAM)

When a model doesn't fit, -ngl N keeps the last layers on the CPU instead. The rule to internalize: offloaded layers run at CPU speed, not a percentage of GPU speed. Practical patterns: drop just the last 2–4 layers to the CPU to reclaim ~0.5–1 GB of VRAM (nearly free); keep MoE experts on CPU with --n-cpu-moe; park the output embedding with -ot output=CPU to save another ~0.5–1 GB on big models. Budget 32 GB of system RAM for 27B-class offload, 64 GB for 70B. Never offload the KV cache — the conversation gets unusably slow.

2-card example llama-server -m 27b-q4_k_m.gguf -ngl 99 -sm layer -c 16384 --tensor-split 1,1

Recommended llama.cpp command

llama-server -m qwen3-30b-a3b-q3_k_l.gguf -ngl 99 -c 8192 -b 2048 -ub 2048 --cache-type-k q8_0 --cache-type-v q8_0 --host 127.0.0.1 --port 8080

Verdict

The value card of the RTX 50 Series: 16 GB GDDR7 at mainstream money puts the 13B quality tier, MoE models, and (at Q3) 27B on a single quiet 180 W card. The 128-bit bus is the ceiling — if you want 3090-class generation speed alongside the VRAM, the 5070 Ti is the step up. For the price, few cards in any generation offered more model-per-dollar.

← RTX 5060 next: RTX 5070 →