NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB

The budget LLM pick of Ada. 16 GB at a fraction of 3090 money — 13B at Q6, MoE 30B, a 27B Q3 demo — all on a slow 128-bit bus.

16 GB GDDR6 288 GB/s 128-bit bus 160 W TDP

Technical specifications

GPU die
AD106
CUDA cores
4352
Boost clock
~2.54 GHz
VRAM
16 GB GDDR6
Memory bus
128-bit
Memory bandwidth
288 GB/s
PCIe
4.0 x16
NVLink
none
TDP
160 W
Release
Jun 2023

What these specs mean for llama.cpp

The tier the VRAM opens

Double the 8 GB sibling's memory and the model list stops being a small-model list:

The bus keeps the receipts

288 GB/s is the slowest bus on the 16 GB tier — a 5060 Ti 16G has the same width at 1.55× the speed, and a 4070 Ti Super has 2.3×. Token generation here is fine for the models that fit (21–29 t/s on 13B Q4); it is not fast. The value math is VRAM-per-dollar, and on that score this card is the series' best.

Power and noise

160 W for a 16 GB card. In a 24/7 box the 4060 Ti 16G sips where the 3090 gulps — a real difference when the card is the server.

Why it's the budget pick The 30-series never paired 16 GB with sub-$500 money; the 3060 12G capped out short. This card puts the 13B-quality-and-MoE tier within reach of any build, at 160 W. The 3090 remains the speed answer; this is the price answer.

The MTP question: if your model ships a built-in multi-token-prediction head (Qwen 3.5/3.6/3.8, Gemma 4), the one-flag speculative pass (--spec-type draft-mtp --spec-draft-n-max 2 --parallel 1) is worth +40–70% (estimated) on token generation here; no per-card A/B in the record yet; slow-bus cards historically gain the most at n-max 2. The price is ~0.6–2 GB of VRAM, the output is bit-identical to the unaccelerated run, and models without MTP heads (Llama class) see nothing. Full tuning rules in the MTP guide.

Expected performance (Q4_K_M, single GPU)

ModelSize on GPUToken genToken gen (MTP est.)Prompt proc.Fits?
8B Q8_0~9.7 GB~40–54 t/s~56–92 t/s~400–550 t/s✅ 32K ctx
13B Q4_K_M~8.5 GB~21–29 t/s~30–49 t/s~450–550 t/s✅ 32K+ ctx
13B Q6_K~13.8 GB~16–22 t/s~23–37 t/s~400–500 t/s✅ 8K ctx
27B Q3_K_M~15.8 GB~6–8 t/s~9–14 t/s~300 t/s⚠️ 4K ctx
MoE 30B-A3B (Q3)~14.5 GB~23–31 t/s~33–53 t/s~400–500 t/s⚠️ 4–8K ctx, 3B active

MTP est. = rough prior with --spec-type draft-mtp for models that ship MTP heads (Qwen 3.5/3.6/3.8, Gemma 4); Llama-class models get no MTP speedup. Actual gains depend on model, quant, context length, llama.cpp build and your card — sweep --spec-draft-n-max, don't trust the column blindly. MTP guide →

Figures assume full offload (-ngl 99), ~8K context and batch 2048. Token speed tracks the memory bus almost linearly, so treat ranges as class estimates — your llama.cpp build and the model's attention layout shift them. MoE speed tracks active parameters, not total size — the 30B-A3B row is the card's headline trick.

27B models (Qwen class) — Q4 / Q5 / Q6 / Q8

QuantGGUF size1× 4060 Ti 16G (16 GB)2× 4060 Ti 16G (32 GB)
Q3_K_M~15.8 GB⚠️ ~6–8 t/s, 4K ctx✅ (overkill)
Q4_K_M~19 GB❌ ~3 GB over✅ ~11–14 t/s, 8K ctx
Q5_K_M~22 GB❌✅ ~9–12 t/s, 4–8K ctx
Q6_K~25 GB❌✅ ~8–10 t/s, 4–8K ctx
Q8_0~33 GB❌❌ ~1 GB over

Single-card 27B means Q3 at 4K — usable in a pinch, clearly quant-limited. The 2-card build (320 W, 32 GB) is the series' value 27B rig: Q4 at a modest pace, Q5/Q6 at short context, and MoE 30B at full Q4 (~18 GB) streaming at ~30–38 t/s. Slower than a 3090 pair at the same models, cheaper to build and run.

Practical tips

Multi-card: 2×, 3×, 4×

PCIe 4.0, ~25–35% split tax. 16 GB tiles mean a pair lands on the 27B Q4 line (32 GB).

BuildGPU powerVRAM27B Q4_K_M27B Q5_K_MMoE 30B Q4
2× 4060 Ti 16G320 W32 GB~11–14 t/s, 8K ctx~9–12 t/s, 4–8K ctx~30–38 t/s

The pair is the card's reason to exist in plural: 32 GB at 320 W, no workstation board required — two x16 (or x8/x8) slots on a normal ATX close the job.

Value 27B rig Against 2× 3090 (700 W, 48 GB, NVLink): the 4060 Ti pair runs 27B Q4 slower but costs and sips far less, and it's a normal-desktop build. Against 2× 5070 Ti (600 W, 32 GB): the new pair is ~3× faster per token at launch-window money. Buy the 4060 Ti pair on budget, the others on ambition.

Offloading (CPU RAM)

When a model won't fit, -ngl N parks the tail layers on the CPU. The mental model that saves pain: offloaded layers don't run at a fraction of GPU speed — they run at CPU speed. Handy moves: peel the last 2–4 layers off to reclaim ~0.5–1 GB of VRAM for almost nothing; keep MoE experts on CPU with --n-cpu-moe; park the output embedding with -ot output=CPU on big models. Budget 32 GB system RAM for 27B-class offload, 64 GB for 70B. And never offload the KV cache — the session becomes unusable.

2-card example llama-server -m 27b-q4_k_m.gguf -ngl 99 -sm layer -c 8192 --tensor-split 1,1

Recommended llama.cpp command

llama-server -m llama-3.1-13b-q4_k_m.gguf -ngl 99 -c 32768 -b 2048 -ub 2048 --cache-type-k q8_0 --cache-type-v q8_0 --host 127.0.0.1 --port 8080

Verdict

The RTX 4060 Ti 16G is Ada's LLM card, full stop: the cheapest door into 16 GB, the 13B quality tier, MoE models and 27B-at-Q3, at 160 W. The 128-bit bus caps its speed where the 3090-class cards soar — but nobody at this price point is paying for speed, they're paying for the models that fit. And it fits the most of any card below it.

← RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB next: RTX 4070 →